Skip to content

Conversation

@Kvnbbg
Copy link
Owner

@Kvnbbg Kvnbbg commented Nov 5, 2025

Summary

  • add a 2025 Android developer readiness briefing covering AI tooling, platform behaviors, UI updates, and security policies
  • link the main README "Learn More" section to the new briefing for easy discovery

Testing

  • Not run (documentation-only change)

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6900f8bc79ec832ab6254b399e2bfe5b

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines 13 to 15
class InputValidator {
static final Random _secureRandom = Random.secure();
// Expressions régulières pour la validation

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Guard generateSecureToken against web platforms lacking Random.secure

The token generation now stores a Random.secure() instance in a static field. On Dart/Flutter web targets Random.secure() is unimplemented and throws UnsupportedError, so any web build that calls InputValidator.generateSecureToken() (e.g., CSRF fallback or salt generation) will crash instead of producing a token. If this validator is shared with web clients, authentication flows break outright. Provide a platform-aware fallback or defer to Random()/crypto APIs when Random.secure is unavailable.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@openhands-ai
Copy link

openhands-ai bot commented Nov 5, 2025

Looks like there are a few issues preventing this PR from being merged!

  • GitHub Actions are failing:
    • Vision Week CI
    • Automatic Dependency Submission (Gradle)
    • Automatic Dependency Submission (Gradle)

If you'd like me to help, just leave a comment, like

@OpenHands please fix the failing actions on PR #13 at branch `codex/refine-code-review-scope-and-strategy-jonz14`

Feel free to include any additional details that might help me get this PR into a better state.

You can manage your notification settings

@Kvnbbg Kvnbbg merged commit e9822bd into main Nov 5, 2025
2 of 7 checks passed
@Kvnbbg Kvnbbg deleted the codex/refine-code-review-scope-and-strategy-jonz14 branch November 5, 2025 00:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants