Skip to content

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Mar 21, 2025

We've tested your project with an updated dependency and the build failed.

This version is either within the version range you specified or you haven't specified a version/range. To be able to test your project with the new version, we've taken the liberty of pinning the version for this branch and pull request.

name version specification new version
@apollo/client ^3.7.14 3.13.5

Unfortunately, we encountered failing tests after pinning. This means that this new version is not compatible with your project and the test failure will potentially also happen on fresh installs.

If you have correctly specified a semantic versioning version range, you should probably also file an issue with the upstream project as they might have released an update that's breaking SemVer rules, which is not cool. (But then again, not all projects explicitly follow SemVer)

We've left the pull request open for you to investigate this issue. Please don't merge it as is, because, again, we've pinned the version of @apollo/client for this test run.

What changed?

✳️ @​apollo/client (^3.7.14 → 3.13.5) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.13.5

Patch Changes

  • #12461 12c8d06 Thanks @jerelmiller! - Fix an issue where a cache-first query would return the result for previous variables when a cache update is issued after simultaneously changing variables and skipping the query.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 8 commits:

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 21, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
next-wordpress-starter ❌ Failed (Inspect) Mar 21, 2025 8:11pm

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Closed in favor of #667.

@depfu depfu bot closed this Apr 11, 2025
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/check/npm/@apollo/client-3.13.5 branch April 11, 2025 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant