Update dependencies and base image (GSI-1854) #66
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 17938489613Details
💛 - Coveralls |
TheByronHimes
previously approved these changes
Sep 22, 2025
mephenor
previously approved these changes
Sep 22, 2025
Member
Author
|
Sorry, added 4 more commits, can you re-approve? |
TheByronHimes
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2025
mephenor
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The commons lib already supported Python 3.13, I just added the classifier and updated the base image to use Python 3.13 as well, and the latest Debian. Needed to deactivate Moby because it is not supported there. Also, switched uivcorn from websockets (default) to the newer websockets-sansio. We're currently not using it, but it also avoids deprecation warnings.
Also un-supported Python 3.9 since some of our deps do not support it any more in their latest version. With our single lock file approach we would need to make concessions and use older versions of deps just to accomodate Python 3.9. Maybe we should test older Python versions without lock file. But Python 3.9 has reached its EOL anyway and does not even get security patches any more, so we should not support it any more either.