Skip to content

Conversation

@rladdusaw
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #5307

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 7, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 95.149% (-0.04%) from 95.185%
when pulling e0f9e76 on 5307-audit-alma-provider
into f9629f8 on main.

@rladdusaw rladdusaw marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2025 22:20
Copy link
Member

@kevinreiss kevinreiss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @rladdusaw. A couple of questions we can discuss on Monday.

end

def eligible?
return false unless patron_group_eligible? || patron.guest?
Copy link
Member

@kevinreiss kevinreiss Nov 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to add this check for Aeon items? All users should be able to see this option. I think https://github.com/pulibrary/orangelight/blob/main/docs/requests/patron_groups.md is incorrect. Aeon should probably be in it's own category as any user (including the "guest" user in the blacklight sense should be allowed to see the links for Reading Room Requests.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Aeon items seem to be working fine in QA.

@rladdusaw rladdusaw marked this pull request as draft November 11, 2025 16:00
@kevinreiss kevinreiss marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2025 20:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Audit Use of the alma_provider? Method

5 participants