docs: fix the path reference for nixl docs

[nv-tusharma]

Overview:

NIXL paths were not properly getting redirected due to the path. sphinx-reredirects interprets the relative path from the directory containing the source file, not from the file itself.

Details:

• Update relative path for NIXL docs

Where should the reviewer start?

Related Issues: (use one of the action keywords Closes / Fixes / Resolves / Relates to)

• closes GitHub issue: #xxx

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Corrected API documentation redirect paths to ensure reliable navigation to technical reference materials.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated relative path redirects in Sphinx documentation configuration for Nixl Connect API pages. Changed redirect targets from ../../api/... to ../api/..., adjusting the directory traversal depth for all listed API redirects without modifying other redirect rules or logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Sphinx docs redirect path adjustment docs/conf.py	Updated redirect target paths for Nixl Connect API pages, changing relative path traversal from two directories up (../../api/...) to one directory up (../api/...) across all affected API redirects

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

• Verify that updated relative paths correctly resolve to the intended API documentation destinations
• Confirm no unintended side effects on other redirect rules in the configuration
• Check that the path change aligns with current documentation directory structure

Poem

🐰 One hop forward, two hops back,
Now just one hop stays on track!
API paths find their way,
Redirects fixed for docs today. 🎯

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: fixing path references for NIXL documentation redirects.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description covers the Overview and Details sections with clear explanation of the issue and changes, though the Related Issues section has a placeholder issue number.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1cf3c2 and 24d8887.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/conf.py (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Build and Test - dynamo

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/conf.py (1)

53-63: LGTM! Path correction verified and correct.

The verification confirms that all 11 NIXL Connect API redirect entries have been successfully updated to use ../api/ paths and are syntactically valid. The configuration loaded successfully with no errors, and each redirect is correctly formatted for sphinx-reredirects path interpretation.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}