Skip to content

Conversation

@marcinmajsc
Copy link
Contributor

@marcinmajsc marcinmajsc commented Nov 7, 2025

Link: #27607

Link: openwrt/openwrt@1b48ebd

📦 Package Details

Maintainer: Ted Hess [email protected]
https://codeberg.org/tenacityteam/libid3tag.git

Description:
libid3tag is a library for reading and (eventually) writing ID3 tags, both ID3v1 and the various versions of ID3v2


🧪 Run Testing Details

  • OpenWrt Version: master
  • OpenWrt Target/Subtarget:
  • OpenWrt Device:

✅ Formalities

  • I have reviewed the CONTRIBUTING.md file for detailed contributing guidelines.

If your PR contains a patch:

  • It can be applied using git am
  • It has been refreshed to avoid offsets, fuzzes, etc., using
    make package/feeds/packages/libid3tag/refresh V=s
  • It is structured in a way that it is potentially upstreamable
    (e.g., subject line, commit description, etc.)
    We must try to upstream patches to reduce maintenance burden.

@marcinmajsc marcinmajsc force-pushed the libid3tag_cmake_min_ver branch from 9f09f33 to d83bf31 Compare November 7, 2025 06:30
@marcinmajsc marcinmajsc requested a review from BKPepe November 7, 2025 06:31
@BKPepe
Copy link
Member

BKPepe commented Nov 7, 2025

I'd say that in this case, I'd prefer if the number in PKG_RELEASE, which you can find in the Makefile, was incremented, because that will help us know and distinguish which version contains this fix or not. Others might have a different opinion though. :) This looks better than before.

@marcinmajsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

marcinmajsc commented Nov 7, 2025

I'd say that in this case, I'd prefer if the number in PKG_RELEASE, which you can find in the Makefile, was incremented, because that will help us know and distinguish which version contains this fix or not. Others might have a different opinion though. :) This looks better than before.

Did you mean something like this? marcinmajsc@e0bcbb2

@hnyman
Copy link
Contributor

hnyman commented Nov 7, 2025

Did you mean something like this? marcinmajsc@e0bcbb2

Likely yes. Incrementing that makes it clear that there has been a change.

(although in this case it likely doesn't mean much, as we are already happily compiling the packages with cmake 3.31, so bumping the min requirement from a really ancient version 3.1 to a semi.ancient version 3.10 is likely a rather null-op change)

@marcinmajsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

marcinmajsc commented Nov 7, 2025

Likely yes. Incrementing that makes it clear that there has been a change.

(although in this case it likely doesn't mean much, as we are already happily compiling the packages with cmake 3.31, so bumping the min requirement from a really ancient version 3.1 to a semi.ancient version 3.10 is likely a rather null-op change)

Ok, so what now do it in PR? @hnyman @BKPepe

  • Current patch stay + bump PKG_RELEASE in Makefile
  • Replace commit in PR with marcinmajsc@e0bcbb2 (in makefile changed source version to upstream commit, rm mirror hash and bump PKG_RELEASE)

@hnyman
Copy link
Contributor

hnyman commented Nov 8, 2025

Current patch stay + bump PKG_RELEASE in Makefile

That would be perfect.
Taking the actual upstream commit is always nice, and bumping the PKG_RELEASE makes it clear that there is a change.

@marcinmajsc marcinmajsc force-pushed the libid3tag_cmake_min_ver branch from d83bf31 to a156489 Compare November 8, 2025 14:29
@hnyman hnyman merged commit ae76b4f into openwrt:master Nov 8, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants