Skip to content

Conversation

@Akretsch
Copy link
Collaborator

@DDvO
Copy link
Member

DDvO commented Oct 28, 2025

Please rebase and extend the new sentence currently ending in
(regardless of the configuration related to reprotection or output credentials).

to point out that this is only if EnforceReprotectMode is false.

@Akretsch Akretsch force-pushed the fix_force_ReprotectMode branch from 2781634 to 3703819 Compare October 28, 2025 15:02
@Akretsch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Akretsch commented Oct 28, 2025

Please rebase and extend the new sentence currently ending in (regardless of the configuration related to reprotection or output credentials).

to point out that this is only if EnforceReprotectMode is false.

Rebase and text proposal done.

Copy link
Member

@DDvO DDvO left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Further corrections, for precisely describing the behavior.

@DDvO
Copy link
Member

DDvO commented Nov 4, 2025

As we just aligned, I updated my improvements on the documentation.
Please check if they are to-the-point.

Co-authored-by: David von Oheimb <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants